Liquidity management: A renewed focus for European funds

October 21, 2020

Liquidity management in funds, as a regulatory requirement, has long been a familiar consideration for investment managers. But now, new guidelines in this area demand additional attention.

 

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) recently unveiled its Guidelines on liquidity stress testing (LST) in AIFs and UCITS. which came into effect on 30 September, 2020. As a key component of the new guidelines, all aspects of liquidity management in an LST policy must now be documented. This documentation will form the basis for required verification by the depositary. We’ll explore what this means in greater detail below.

 

Background: heightened scrutiny by European regulators

Liquidity management has become an area of renewed focus for regulators across Europe in recent years. In April 2018, the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) issued Recommendations on liquidity and leverage risks in investment funds. These recommendations were driven primarily by concerns over the increasing roll of funds in a low interest environment. Regulators worried that the increase could amplify the negative impact of mismatches between the liquidity of fund assets and their redemption profiles.

The ESRB recommendations prompted ESMA to publish guidance, which it did in September 2019, for managers to follow to stress test liquidity risk for individual AIFs and UCITS. The goal was threefold:

  • Clarify the existing requirements for managers, depositaries and national regulators under the UCITS directive and AIFMD 
  • Increase the standard, consistency and frequency (where necessary) of LST undertaken
  • Promote convergent supervision of LST by national regulators

 

Continuing focus by the Central Bank of Ireland

The importance of liquidity management to regulators in Europe increased after a prominent flagship fund in the U.K. dissolved in June 2019. This event prompted the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) to remind the industry in August 2019 of “the importance of ongoing, effective liquidity management and … compliance.” Then amid Covid-19 market uncertainty, CBI issued managers yet another reminder in April 2020. 

 

What do the guidelines do?

The guidelines were intended to increase the consistency of supervision and compliance with UCITS and AIFMD requirements. This means regulators view them more as a starting point than a substantial change. What’s different, though, is that there’s now a uniform, principles-based approach to LST analysis and documentation – with flexibility for managers to accommodate a fund’s specific characteristics. For greater clarity, ESMA helpfully expanded on each guideline with paragraphs of supplementary information, relevant insights and explanatory considerations. 

 

Key challenge: investor data availability

The low availability of data on underlying investors presents a key challenge to the performance of LST on redemption. To acknowledge this issue, the guidelines set the following expectations for managers:

  • Monitor historical outflows (average and trends over time) 
  • Average peer fund redemptions and information from any distribution network regarding forecast redemptions
  • Model or simulate investor behaviour against a range of factors (i.e., investor category, concentration, location and strategy)
     

Faced with the complexity of these expectations, more managers see the benefit of partnering with a data-rich fund administrator that can provide guidance and solutions for the many challenges.

 

The “new” LST policy and role of the depositary

Although managers should already have LST process documentation in place, the guidelines now specify certain minimum content parameters. The guidelines also require an LST policy, which forms part of the UCITS or AIF risk management policy (RMP). Managers must review and update existing LST policies to ensure that any requests from the regulators or the depositary who is tasked with verifying process documentation can be met.

A lack of consistency in RMP reviews across the EU led to a need for clarification on the role of the depositary. The guidelines now explicitly state that the depositary isn’t required to assess, replicate or challenge a manager’s LST. Rather, the depositary’s role is to check that the LST policy is in place.

 

What’s next?

The focus on liquidity management isn’t going away any time soon. High profile fund crashes, market uncertainty and the rising importance of funds will continue to keep this topic relevant for the foreseeable future.

The new guidelines represent the most recent layer of regulatory expectation, but if they don’t produce the desired effect, regulators could roll out even more prescriptive measures. By taking every effort to stay within compliance, managers can reap immediate benefits and help support a stronger future for the entire industry.


Learn more about our depositary services offering and other European fund administration solutions.

Related content

Programme debt Q&A: U.S. issuers entering the European market

High-yield bond issuance: how to avoid 5 common pain points

IRC Section 305(c): Deemed distributions and related regulations

Complying with changes in fund regulations

Small business growth: 6 strategies for scaling your business

Manufacturing: 6 supply chain optimization strategies

Healthcare marketing: How to promote your medical practice

Risk management strategies for foreign exchange hedging

Trends in economics, immigration and mobility policy

Liquidity management: A renewed focus for European funds

Emerging trends in Europe: An outlook from multiple perspectives

Administrator accountability: 5 questions to evaluate outsourcing risks

Key considerations for launching an ILP

5 questions you should ask your custodian about outsourcing

10 ways a global custodian can support your growth

4 strategies for coping with market volatility

How to avoid being the victim of a digital payments scam

How to choose the right custodian for your managed assets

Fraud prevention checklist

Crack the SWIFT code for sending international wires

Luxembourg's thriving private debt market

Alternative investments: How to track returns and meet your goals

Hospitals face cybersecurity risks in surprising new ways

Case study: U.S. asset manager expands to Europe

Rule 2a-5 overview: Good faith determinations of fair value

Webinar: Cash management strategies for higher education

3 tips to maintain flexibility in supply chain management

Luxembourg funds: 5 indicators of efficient onboarding

5 steps you should take after a major data breach

Why KYC — for organizations

What is CSDR, and how will you be affected?

Rule 18f-4: An in-depth look at the derivative risk management program and value-at-risk

Rule 18f-4: The limited use exception

Rule 18f-4 overview: Regulatory framework changes for derivatives

3 reasons your Luxembourg fund needs an in-market administrator

ESG-focused investing: A closer look at the disclosure regulation

BEC: Recognize a scam

The password: Enhancing security and usability

3 timeless tips to reduce corporate payments fraud

Automate escheatment for accounts payable to save time and money

Maximizing your deductions: Section 179 and Bonus Depreciation

Protecting cash balances with sweep vehicles

Avoiding the pitfalls of warehouse lending

Rethinking European ETFs: Strategy wrappers and a means to an end

Proactive ways to fight vendor fraud

How to improve your business network security

Government agency credit card programs and PCI compliance

For small business growth, consider the international market

The benefits of bundling services for Luxembourg regulated funds

Depositary services: A brief overview

Combined strength: Luxembourg and your fund administrator

The benefits of a full-service warehouse custodian

A first look at the new fund of funds rule

Webinar: Fraud prevention and mitigation for government agencies

3 innovative approaches to ESG investing in Europe

Webinar: CRE Digital Transformation – Balancing Digitization with cybersecurity risk

Webinar: Recording of the Central Securities Depository Regulation and Pivot

Webinar: Robotic process automation

U.S. Bank Global Fund Services is a wholly owned subsidiary of U.S. Bank, N. A. 

U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (Ireland) Limited is registered in Ireland with the Companies Registration Office Reg. No. 413707 and Registered Office: 24-26 City Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland. U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (Ireland) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland under the Investment Intermediaries Act, 1995.

U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (Guernsey) Limited is licensed under the Protection of Investors Law (Bailiwick of Guernsey), 1987, as amended by the Guernsey Financial Services Commission to conduct controlled investment business in the Bailiwick of Guernsey.

U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (Luxembourg) S.a.r.l. is registered in Luxembourg with RCS number B238278 and Registered Office: Floor 3, K2 Ballade, 4, rue Albert Borschette, L-1246 Luxembourg. U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (Luxembourg) S.a.r.l. is authorised and regulated by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier.

Investment products and services are: 
NOT A DEPOSIT • NOT FDIC INSURED • MAY LOSE VALUE • NOT BANK GUARANTEED • NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY

U.S. Bank does not guarantee products, services or performance of its affiliates and third-party providers.

Start of disclosure content

Loan approval is subject to credit approval and program guidelines. Not all loan programs are available in all states for all loan amounts. Interest rate and program terms are subject to change without notice. Mortgage, home equity and credit products are offered by U.S. Bank National Association. Deposit products are offered by U.S. Bank National Association. Member FDIC.

U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services or performance of U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.