Capitalize on today's evolving market dynamics.
With changes to taxes and interest rates, it's a good time to meet with a wealth advisor.
Reinsurance investing can deliver premium-based income with low sensitivity to the business cycle, adding portfolio diversification beyond stocks and bonds.
Long-term results show attractive returns, but outcomes vary by disaster losses, pricing, and purchase timing.
Key risks include natural disasters and climate-related severity, yet insurers can reprice premiums after losses, supporting capital rebuilding and future claims capacity.
Reinsurance is gaining popularity as qualified investors seek return sources that don’t depend on the traditional business cycle. Instead of relying on corporate earnings or interest rate shifts, these strategies can capture insurance premium economics while adding portfolio diversification value.
Unlike stocks and bonds, performance of insurance-linked securities is not tied to the economic cycle, Federal Reserve policy, or shifting investor sentiment.”
Natalie Burke, co-head of public markets manager research with U.S. Bank Asset Management Group
This overview explains how reinsurance investing works, what drives returns, and where the key risks lie – especially in a world where headlines about climate and catastrophes arrive fast.
Reinsurance plays a key role in the insurance industry. Insurance companies don’t keep every risk on their own balance sheets. They regularly transfer a portion of potential payment obligations to reinsurers, paying premiums in exchange for that protection.
In many structures, the reinsurer’s responsibility begins only after losses cross a defined threshold – for example, damages reaching $500 million before coverage activates – so the exposure is specific and contractually defined.
Reinsurance can serve investors who want portfolio diversification without abandoning the pursuit of income. Rather than tying results to consumer demand, corporate margins, or recession dynamics, reinsurance often links outcomes to insured event pricing and insurance premium pricing.
That difference can make it a compelling complement to stocks and bonds when you want a return stream built on a distinct set of drivers.
Catastrophe (cat) bonds connect investors directly to defined catastrophe risks, such as hurricane damage, through a rules-based structure. When the specified event occurs and meets the trigger terms, catastrophe bonds pay insurance companies to help cover claims and investors may see a reduction in their principal. When events don’t trigger losses, investors can earn income that reflects the price of underwriting that risk.
Cat bonds are part of a broader instrument set known as insurance-linked securities (ILS). Investors can allocate a portion of their portfolio to access return and risk characteristics that can look fundamentally different from traditional assets, including low sensitivity to the business cycle.
For portfolios built around stocks and bonds, that difference can translate into improved diversification when traditional stock-bond correlations rise at the wrong time.
The basic math is intuitive even if the modeling is complex. Insurance companies pay premiums to transfer specific risks, and those premiums become an income stream for ILS investors. Investors benefit when premium income exceeds any loss payouts after catastrophic events, while losses typically show up through loss of a bond’s principal value.
A helpful way to frame reinsurance is to compare it to corporate bonds – steady income with occasional loss events – while remembering the loss trigger is different. “Corporate bond investors receive steady income but may occasionally incur a credit loss if the bond issuer is unable or unwilling to make timely principal and interest payments,” says Natalie Burke, co-head of public markets manager research with U.S. Bank Asset Management Group. “Investors must determine whether the income stream is sufficient to offset periodic credit losses of varying magnitude. It is similar with reinsurance, with losses determined by specific catastrophic loss events.”
Reinsurance returns naturally vary because catastrophic events don’t occur on a schedule. Even so, historical results show annualized returns exceeding 7% since 2002, comparing favorably with high-yield bonds and U.S. equities over the same span. 1
Importantly, reinsurance generated these favorable returns with lower annualized volatility and most returns came from income distributions, which can help buffer portfolios during years with severe insured loss events.
A central appeal of reinsurance is that its return drivers can differ from what moves equities and core fixed income. “Unlike stocks and bonds, performance of insurance-linked securities is not tied to the economic cycle, Federal Reserve monetary policy, or shifting investor sentiment,” says Burke. “This is because of its different risk sources, specifically losses from catastrophes rather than a downturn in the business cycle.”
iversification is not about finding something that always rises; it’s about combining assets that don’t behave the same way at the same time. Correlations represent the extent to which returns of different types of assets move in the same direction (a correlation near 1.0), or in the opposite direction (a correlation at or near -1.0).
Over a 24-year period, reinsurance showed low correlation versus a 60% stock/40% bond portfolio, which implies potential diversification benefits when paired thoughtfully with traditional assets. That said, correlations can change, and outcomes still depend on timing, pricing, and the specific risks an investor accepts.
Reinsurance also reflects how the world is evolving. Developed economies still dominate the insured asset market, but emerging economies may expand coverage needs if recent trends continue. That expansion can enhance the global diversification story while providing capital that supports growing overseas insurance demand.
The primary risk is straightforward: substantial losses can follow major natural disasters. Investor outcomes can also shift with entry and exit timing, changes in premium pricing and the frequency, magnitude, and location of events. The most investor-relevant question becomes whether the premiums you earn sufficiently compensate for the specific event risks you are underwriting.
Climate discussions often focus on whether disasters are becoming more frequent and severe. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), landfalling hurricanes have not significantly increased since data became available in 1851. 2 Even if storm counts don’t surge, risk can still rise through higher population densities, increasing insured property values, and the expansion of insured areas exposed to damage.
Wildfires tend to dominate news cycles, yet long history is harder to evaluate due to limited reliable data. National Interagency Fire Center data since 1983 indicate that the number of wildfires has decreased while the area burned has increased in recent years. That pattern matters for reinsurance because severity – and therefore loss size – can drive results more than event counts alone. 3
Unlike a static coupon, reinsurance pricing can adjust as conditions evolve. “Reinsurers typically modify premiums to reflect changing loss expectations,” says Burke. “Expectations are derived based on data assessing the risk of natural disasters occurring and potential losses associated with them.” This pricing discipline is central to long-run viability because it’s how the market attempts to rebuild capital and sustain the ability to pay claims.
Insurance and reinsurance companies have strong motivation to price risk conservatively enough to remain profitable and maintain credit strength. “In the wake of significant losses due to more frequent or severe catastrophes, insurance companies apply premium increases to help rebuild capital, retain strong credit ratings, and bolster their ability to meet future claims,” says Burke. “Insurers will utilize premium hikes to address rising climate-disaster-related claims.”
Over the past 25 years, publicly traded U.S. insurance companies posted strong profitability, with median annual earnings growth of 12% versus 7% for the broader S&P 500. That track record suggests insurers have generally been able to assess and price evolving risks rather than operate as perpetual loss-takers. For investors, that matters because a resilient underwriting ecosystem is what keeps insurance premium markets functioning through event cycles.
As of October 2025, recent reinsurance income significantly surpassed average historical losses. “This indicates an ability for reinsurance investments to deliver strong results even if natural disaster losses exceed historical norms,” says Burke. “Long-term investors may benefit from a combination of portfolio diversification, substantial current income, and the cushion that income provides to help offset potential losses from excessive claims.”
Investor access has expanded as the insurance and reinsurance markets have grown and the need for underwriting capital has increased. Hedge funds originally served as a key entry point, but they often require longer commitments and offer limited liquidity. Over time, interval and mutual funds have broadened access. Interval funds, which are not traded on public exchanges, offer greater liquidity than hedge funds through more frequent investment and redemption opportunities. Mutual funds, meanwhile, provide the highest liquidity through daily trading.
Reinsurance lets insurance companies transfer some of their potential claim obligations to another party (a reinsurer) in exchange for premiums, so the original insurer doesn’t keep every risk on its own balance sheet. As an investor, you can access this risk transfer market through instruments such as catastrophe (cat) bonds, where you earn premium like income when covered events do not trigger losses.
If a defined catastrophe occurs and meets the contract’s trigger terms, the insurer receives funds and you may lose some principal, so returns depend on whether premium income outweighs event driven losses over time.
Investors typically use reinsurance as a complement to stocks and bonds, sizing it thoughtfully to add another income stream with different drivers than corporate earnings or interest rate shifts.
You can gain exposure through several vehicle types—hedge funds, interval funds, or mutual funds—each offering a different tradeoff between liquidity and commitment length.
In practice, you align the structure (and its liquidity) with your goals and constraints, then evaluate the specific event exposures you are underwriting so the premium potential compensates you for the risks you assume.
Reinsurance can diversify because its results often link to premium pricing and insured event outcomes rather than the traditional business cycle that tends to drive stocks and core bonds. Over long periods, reinsurance has shown low correlation versus a traditional 60/40 stock bond mix, which can help when stock bond correlations rise at the wrong time.
Diversification still depends on timing, pricing, and the exact risks you choose, so you benefit most when you combine reinsurance with other assets intentionally rather than expecting it to “always zig when others zag.”
Reinsurance can add a differentiated return stream to portfolios when used thoughtfully and sized appropriately. It can also reward patience, because income distributions often do much of the long-term work while losses arrive episodically.
The next practical step is to evaluate structure, liquidity, and risk exposures with your wealth professional to see if an allocation matches goals, constraints, and tolerance for event-driven drawdowns.
For qualifying investors with concentrated stock positions, exchange funds may provide an appealing combination of diversification, long-term returns and tax benefits.
We can partner with you to design an investment strategy that aligns with your goals and is able to weather all types of market cycles.