Beth Ann Bovino
 

Iran and oil: A straight shot of relief?

Promising signs of an interim pact between the U.S. and Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz give me some hope that the U.S. economy could move back toward a pre-war footing. If the energy pass-through risk fades, the Fed, which is still expected to stay on hold this week, would have more room to ease off its hawkish stance.

“If it holds, the deal will meaningfully reduce affordability pressures for the private sector and lower recession risk.”

Beth Ann Bovino, chief economist, U.S. Bank

If it holds, the deal will meaningfully reduce affordability pressures for the private sector and lower recession risk. The U.S. Bank Economics team has been arguing that the U.S. economy is more insulated than in the 1970s and can absorb higher energy prices without tipping into recession. But sustained West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude prices above ~$130 per barrel (with $150 peaks) would materially raise recession risk. The agreement, if durable, makes that scenario less likely.

That is a big “if,” of course. It depends on negotiations holding and evolving into a longer truce.

There are also near-term frictions. Damage to energy infrastructure around the Strait will take time to repair, likely keeping some production offline into the second half of the year.

Meanwhile, pricing pressure from the conflict is still moving through the pipeline. May Producer Price Index (PPI) showed transportation and warehousing costs rising, an early sign that energy and freight pressures are feeding into supply chains. Those effects still need to pass through to consumer prices, which remain above the Fed’s 2% target.

 Bottom line: The Fed is likely to stay on the sidelines until there’s more clarity. But if this holds, the case for further rate hikes looks much weaker.

Explore more

Weekly economic highlights

Read the latest weekly update from the U.S. Bank Economics Research Group.

Monthly economic outlook

See the U.S. Bank Economics Research Group’s forecast for the upcoming month.

Past economic views

Visit the archive to read previous commentaries from U.S. Bank Chief Economist Beth Ann Bovino.

Start of disclosure content

Disclosures

The views expressed in this commentary represent the opinion of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of U.S. Bank. The views are intended for informational use only and are not exhaustive or conclusive. The views are subject to change at any time based on economic or other conditions and are current as of the date indicated on the materials. It is not intended to be a forecast of future events or guarantee of future results. It is not intended to provide specific advice. It is issued without regard to any particular objective or the financial situation of any particular individual. It is not to be construed as an offering of securities or recommendation to invest. It is not for use as a primary basis of investment decisions. It is not to be construed to meet the needs of any particular investor. It is not a representation or solicitation or offer for the purchase or sale of any particular product or service. Investors should consult with their investment professional for advice concerning their particular situation. The factual information provided has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. U.S. Bank is not affiliated or associated with any organizations mentioned. U.S. Bank and its representatives do not provide tax or legal advice. Each individual's tax and financial situation is unique. You should consult your tax and/or legal advisor for advice and information concerning your particular situation.