Your gateway to organizational growth
Explore related insights or solutions.
Asset-based lending (ABL) is used by healthy companies seeking greater liquidity, growth capital, acquisition financing and covenant flexibility.
Because borrowing capacity is based primarily on eligible assets rather than solely on earnings, ABL may provide more liquidity than a traditional cash flow facility.
Modern technology has streamlined collateral reporting, making ABL easier to administer than many companies realize.
For companies with meaningful accounts receivable, inventory or other financeable assets, asset-based lending (ABL) may provide greater borrowing capacity and flexibility than a traditional cash flow loan. Yet many business leaders continue to view ABL through the lens of outdated perceptions formed decades ago.
While ABL was once commonly associated with distressed borrowers, today it is used by middle-market companies, large corporations and private equity sponsors to support growth, acquisitions, recapitalizations, working capital needs and strategic transitions.
“At the end of the day, banks and other ABL lenders are looking to provide borrowers with incremental liquidity that can be used for organic growth, acquisitions, dividend recapitalizations and turnaround strategies,” says John Freeman, Head of Asset-Based Finance, U.S. Bank. “The product provides meaningful flexibility to borrowers.”
Before dismissing ABL as a financing option, it is worth separating fact from fiction.
“For an asset-heavy company with thin margins and lower EBITDA, an ABL can be a better fit than a cash flow structure.”
John Freeman, Head of Asset-Based Finance, U.S. Bank
Reality: ABL has evolved into a mainstream financing solution used by healthy businesses across a wide range of industries. For companies with significant working capital assets, an asset-based structure may provide more liquidity than a facility sized primarily on earnings.
Why it matters: A company does not need to be experiencing financial stress to benefit from ABL. Many borrowers use it proactively to support growth, acquisitions and shareholder objectives.
“For an asset-heavy company with thin margins and lower EBITDA, an ABL can be a better fit than a cash flow structure,” Freeman explains. “It depends on the makeup of the company and the quality of its assets.”
Reality: Many private equity firms incorporate ABL into acquisition and portfolio company financing strategies. Because ABL is driven by collateral values rather than only EBITDA multiples, it can provide an efficient source of senior capital.
Why it matters: ABL may reduce reliance on more expensive forms of debt while increasing the liquidity available to support a transaction.
“ABL sizing is not driven by the same multiple of EBITDA,” Freeman says, “so it may provide more of the total liquidity solution at a lower cost than higher-priced junior debt.”
Reality: ABL facilities can be priced competitively with other senior financing alternatives. Pricing depends on collateral quality, transaction structure, market conditions and the overall banking relationship.
Why it matters: Companies should evaluate alternatives based on total liquidity, covenant flexibility and overall economics rather than outdated assumptions about cost.
Reality: Modern enterprise resource planning systems and automated reporting tools have reduced the administrative burden associated with collateral reporting. Many borrowers can use existing financial systems to satisfy reporting requirements efficiently.
Why it matters: Reporting should be viewed as a practical trade-off for increased borrowing capacity and flexibility, rather than a barrier to considering ABL.
“Modern ERP systems allow today’s ABL borrowers to easily generate and submit period reporting requirements,” says Freeman. “Gone are the days of cumbersome ABL reporting in which companies needed to add dedicated treasury staff to comply with the reporting requirements.”
Read more: When is ABL right for your business?
Traditional revolving credit facilities are typically sized using cash flow metrics such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA. In asset-based lending, banks take a different approach. Borrowing availability is primarily determined by the value of eligible assets, such as accounts receivable and inventory, that serve as collateral for the loan.
Because of this structure, companies with substantial working capital assets may be able to access greater liquidity than they could through a traditional cash flow facility. As assets grow, borrowing availability can increase as well, creating a financing structure that aligns with many businesses' operating cycles.
At its core, ABL helps businesses unlock liquidity from assets already on their balance sheet and deploy that capital to support strategic objectives.
For the right company, it can be a strategic capital solution that enhances liquidity, supports growth and provides greater flexibility than a traditional cash flow structure. The key question is whether the company's balance sheet could support a more efficient financing solution.
At U.S. Bank, we help companies evaluate asset-based finance and other financing alternatives to determine which structure best aligns with their growth objectives, capital needs and operating profile. Contact your relationship manager to learn more.
Companies with high levels of quality working capital assets are ideal candidates for asset-based loans (ABL). Discover what collateral is eligible and what’s not.
We can help you execute your business strategy with tailored solutions to meet your short-term and long-term cash flow needs.
Unlock timely, actionable strategies and perspectives from U.S. Bank experts — delivered straight to your inbox.